<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>JPC - Jason Clarke - Latest Comments in One Year Entropy Rule Valid with XP?</title><link>http://jasonclarke.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 02:51:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: One Year Entropy Rule Valid with XP?</title><link>http://www.jasonclarke.net/archives/2004/08/27/one-year-entropy-rule-valid-with-xp/#comment-1438463</link><description>I've seen "Windows entropy," but not since the release of XP.  I second Marc, though -- my last machine had only what I needed to survive on it, and never once did I want to restage it.  The Win2K box downstairs, though, has had random applications installed and uninstalled so many times that it's a beast to use.  The amount of software you put on it is key.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'd love to know why that is... is it registry bloat?  Drive fragmentation?  An excess number of registered components?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 02:51:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: One Year Entropy Rule Valid with XP?</title><link>http://www.jasonclarke.net/archives/2004/08/27/one-year-entropy-rule-valid-with-xp/#comment-1438462</link><description>Wow - two great comments already! Marc, I hear where you're coming from. I'm also a self-confessed gadget / utility freak, and tend to install and uninstall an inordinate amount of software on my machines. I have friends that reinstall their OS every few months it seems, and while I install and uninstall a lot more "stuff" (ok, a lot of it is crap, but you have to try it to see, right?) I'm surprised that I haven't run into that problem with a machine that's going on 3 years in production. Maybe I've just been lucky on that one, or maybe I'm slowing down compared to how I used to treat my systems. But it seems to me that Windows gets a bad rap for the 1 year arthritis or entropy problem, and that any other OS that was treated the same way (lots of installs and uninstalls) would have similar issues.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2004 20:18:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: One Year Entropy Rule Valid with XP?</title><link>http://www.jasonclarke.net/archives/2004/08/27/one-year-entropy-rule-valid-with-xp/#comment-1438461</link><description>And then there are the likes of me. Bare minimum. Don't rock the boat. No testing. No gaming. I surf. I Blog.  I rip tunes from vinyl. I burn CD's. ho-hum.... but goin on 3 years.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Glen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2004 14:28:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: One Year Entropy Rule Valid with XP?</title><link>http://www.jasonclarke.net/archives/2004/08/27/one-year-entropy-rule-valid-with-xp/#comment-1438460</link><description>Jason:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It depends a bit on how much software you install and uninstall - that is the single biggest contributor to Windows arthritis (or entropy as you label it). I have had XP systems get so crufty I've had to rebuild them after six months (I test a *lot* of software) and others that last 18 months before getting too cranky to put up with.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marc Orchant</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2004 13:41:33 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>